Free from fear or favour
Tracking and cookies. WHY?

That’s True Too

That's True Too

Caroline
Lucas

Grass supplies for cattle grazing on Dorney Common in Buckinghamshire dried up during the July heatwave
Photo: Maureen McLean/Alamy

Give Fossil Fuel Sponsorship the Red Card

I can’t pretend to be much of a football fan, but even I have been enthralled by the twists and turns of this year’s World Cup – the extraordinary emergence of underdogs like Cape Verde, the heroics of Curaçao against Ecuador, and the drama of Egypt versus Argentina.

But I’ve become increasingly enraged by the scale of fossil fuel advertising which now seems to be an indispensable part of the coverage.

As controversial ‘hydration breaks’ give time for yet more of the very fossil fuel advertising that is causing climate heating, it seems more perverse than ever that the largest corporate polluter on the planet, Saudi Aramco, is sponsoring the world’s most-watched sporting event.

This is not a new phenomenon. Last year, the New Weather Institute found that fossil fuel companies alone have pumped $5.6 billion into global ‘sportswashing’ deals, including the World Cup. According to its research, almost no major spectator sport remains untouched by oil and gas finance.

On the Record – Good Old English Narrowboat Days

Reform UK MP Lee Anderson* shares details of his summer escape to the canals of Nottinghamshire
Otto English

‘When the Herd Moves’: Britain’s Pro-Farage Press Finally Turns Against Reform

In an industry that tends to bend towards power rather than against it, the recent media pivot against Nigel Farage is less surprising than it at first appears, writes Adam Bienkov
Adam Bienkov